Jump to Navigation

Overbilling Uninsured and Self Pay Patients

Photo of Armand Leone

Health care prices charged by hospitals and physicians for care provided to uninsured and out-of-network patients are more than 2.5 times what insurance companies pay and more than 3 times their actual costs. Unlike insurance companies, individuals are not able to negotiate a fair price.  Physicians do not obtain "informed financial consent" for their fees from self-pay patients before providing treatment. An unconscious patient or someone in need of urgent care simply is not in a situation where a meaningful discussion about the cost of care can be had. Patients do not have any information about the physicians' actual costs, and they do not have any ability to compare prices between providers. The law of implied contracts provides a fair way to price health care to people without insurance and prevent overbilling.

The law of implied contracts dictates that a patient should pay whatever price a prudent patient and physician would have agreed to if they had the appropriate time and relevant information to negotiate. The best way to prevent overbilling is to use a proxy for informed bargaining, namely the rates charged between providers and private insurers. Insurers are informed purchasers of health care and can negotiate fair market rates. Another method of pricing could be to use Medicare reminbursement rates to approximate the lower range of prices that a reasonably informed negotiation would produce.

The lack of discussion and transparency in the pricing of health care, although financially advantageous to the physicians, prevents individuals from being able to meaningfully negoatiate prices. Insurers and providers consider their prices confidential and do not disclose them. Individuals simply are unable to give informed financial consent to the prices charged for their care. Yet the higher prices paid do not increase the quality of care and do not reduce the risk of malpractice injuries. The doctrine of implied contracts should be used to determine the appropriate price for care and to prevent the overcharging of self-pay patients. The prices charged for health care should be what is custom in the industry, not what is the custom for the individual physician. The prices paid for health care  should not be kept secret, and a fair price should be paid by all.

2 Comments

i am having extreme financial difficulties and will have to droop my medical insurance. This i is quite risky sine i am in my early 60's. How do i know how much blood work doctor appointments anetc will cost out of pocket.

i know there is a price list but am also aware that there can be a 300% differential depending upon variables. How do I negotiate for something I cant pay for even if i obtain tthe best price possible. If i have an open bill i would like it to be as low as possible.

The problem has been that there is no consumer market place for healthcare. If you do not have insurance, there has no place for an individual to go to select a doctor based on training, service needed and price. The best one can do has been able to do is to go to the yellow pages or look online, but you can't comparison shop.

I recently learned of a company SnapHealth located at www.snaphealth.com that allows you to search for a doctor, shop for what you need, schedule appointments and save money by paying cash. These doctors list the services they offer and the price they charge. You select the right doctor for what you need.

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

"The mission of Britcher Leone, LLC is to unite the professional disciplines of medicine and law to help the victims of physicians' malpractice and serious personal injury restore their future and the future of their families." RSS FindLaw Network
Verdicts & Settlements
  • $1,237,004 Verdict for Failure to Properly Treat
  • $42 Million Dollar Vaccine Injury Structured Settlement
  • $5.7 Million Obstetrical Malpractice Structured Settlement
  • $3.8 Million Present Value Pediatric Urological Surgery Settlement
  • $3.38 Million Gross Medical Malpractice Verdict
  • $1.65 Million Present Value Spinal Surgery Settlement
  • $5.2 Million Obstetrical Malpractice Structured Settlement
  • $40 Million Vaccine Structured Award
  • $19 Million Vaccine Structured Award
  • $2.5 Million Failure to Timely Diagnose Breast Cancer Verdict
  • $16 Million Obstetrical Malpractice Structured Settlement
  • $13.6 Million Obstetrical Malpractice Structured Settlement
  • $3.5 Million Resort Negligence Settlement
  • $60 Million Flu Vaccine Structured Settlement
  • $2 Million Wrongful Birth/Wrongful Life Settlement
  • $3.5 Million Present Value Wrongful Death Settlement
  • $1.59 Million Medical Malpractice Judgment
  • $800,000 Recovery Failure to Treat Eye Infection and Vision Loss
  • $1.35 Million Wrongful Death Settlement
  • $1.2 Million Failure to Provide Adequate Security Settlement
  • $850,000 Settlement for Brachial Plexus/Shoulder Dystocia Injury
  • $1 Million Podiatric Malpractice Judgment
  • $863,000 Orthopedic Malpractice Judgment
  • $850,000 Radiology Malpractice Settlement
  • $800,000 Cardiology Malpractice/Wrongful Death Settlement
View All Verdicts
Google+ LinkedIn Uniting Medicine & Law | Rebuilding Your Future